Why Restriction Leads to Binge Eating (and Why It’s Not a Lack of Willpower)

Binge eating is often a biological response to deprivation, not a lack of control or food addiction.

Many people who struggle with binge eating believe something is fundamentally wrong with them. They describe feeling out of control around food, “addicted” to certain foods, or unable to stop once they start eating. What’s often missed in this narrative is a critical piece of physiology: binge eating is a very common and predictable response to food restriction.

Restriction does not have to mean an extreme diet to trigger this response. It can include intentional dieting, rigid food rules, skipping meals, being told what or how much to eat, or living with food insecurity. From the brain’s perspective, all of these signal potential danger. When the body perceives a threat to food availability, it shifts into survival mode.

The Biology of Restriction

When food intake is restricted, the body responds by altering multiple biological systems designed to keep us alive. Hormones that promote fullness, including leptin, peptide YY, and cholecystokinin, decrease. At the same time, levels of ghrelin, a hormone that stimulates hunger, increase. Metabolic processes slow down, energy expenditure decreases, thyroid activity drops, and thoughts about food become more frequent and intrusive.

These changes are not signs of weakness or lack of discipline. They are protective mechanisms. The body is trying to ensure that when food becomes available again, enough is consumed to prevent future scarcity.

This helps explain why binge eating often follows periods of restriction. Once eating resumes, the brain pushes for urgency and volume. Eating past comfortable fullness is not a moral failure. It is the body responding to what it believes is a famine.

Mental Restriction Counts Too

An important and often overlooked factor is that the brain does not distinguish well between physical and mental restriction. Even when someone is technically eating enough, rigid rules like “I shouldn’t be eating this,” “I can only have a small amount,” “I’ll make up for this later,” or labeling foods as “bad” can trigger the same biological alarm system.

In these cases, the threat is not caloric deprivation but anticipated deprivation. The brain prepares for future restriction by increasing hunger signals and preoccupation with food, which can still lead to binge eating episodes.

Dieting and Eating Disorders

Decades of research show that dieting is one of the strongest risk factors for the development of eating disorders. A significant portion of people who start with dieting progress to more severe patterns of restriction, binge eating, purging, or compulsive behaviors around food and exercise. Importantly, many people experience serious distress and impairment without meeting strict diagnostic criteria, meaning the true scope of disordered eating is far broader than formal diagnoses suggest.

This is one reason why dismissing binge eating as “lack of control” or “food addiction” can be so harmful. It overlooks the role of restriction and delays appropriate treatment.

Is Food Addiction Real?

While many people feel addicted to food, current research does not support the idea that specific foods or nutrients are addictive in the same way substances like alcohol or opioids are. No food has been shown to cause intoxication, tolerance, withdrawal, or the life altering consequences associated with substance use disorders.

Some studies point to dopamine release in the brain when we eat highly palatable foods, but dopamine is involved in many pleasurable human experiences, including social connection and novelty. Importantly, research often cited to support food addiction frequently fails to account for dieting history. When restriction is present, binge like behavior becomes far more likely, regardless of the food involved.

What Actually Helps Reduce Binge Eating

If restriction drives binge eating, the path forward is not more control. It is greater safety and consistency.

This means regular meals, adequate nutrition, and gradually removing rigid food rules. Over time, when the brain learns that food is reliably available and not forbidden, the survival response quiets. Hunger cues stabilize, cravings become less urgent, and eating feels less chaotic.

This process can feel emotionally uncomfortable at first. Many people fear that giving themselves permission to eat will make things worse. Clinically, the opposite is true. Abundance reduces urgency. Trust reduces panic. What initially feels like “loss of control” is often a transitional phase as the nervous system recalibrates.

Binge eating is not a character flaw. It is a predictable response to deprivation. When treatment focuses on nourishment, flexibility, and safety rather than punishment or restraint, eating patterns tend to normalize over time.

MELISSA GERSON, LCSW

Melissa Gerson is the founder of Columbus Park Center for Eating Disorders in New York City. Over the last 20-plus years, she has trained in just about every evidence-based eating disorder treatment available to individuals with eating disorders: a dizzying list of acronyms including CBT-E, CBT-AR, DBT, FBT, IPT, SSCM, FBI and more.

Among Melissa’s most important achievements has been a certification as a Family-Based Treatment provider; with her mastery of this potent and life-changing (and life-saving!) modality, she’s treated hundreds of young people successfully and continues to maintain a small caseload of FBT clients as she also focuses on leadership and management roles at Columbus Park.

Since founding Columbus Park in 2008, Melissa has trained multiple generations of eating disorder professionals and has dedicated her time to a combination of clinical practice, writing, and presenting.

https://www.columbuspark.com
Next
Next

CBT-E for Teens: What Parents Need to Know